The Securities and Exchange Commission charged Ramil Palafox on April 22, 2025, with orchestrating a fraudulent scheme that raised approximately $198 million from roughly 90,000 investors worldwide between January 2020 and October 2021, while misappropriating more than $57 million of those funds for his own personal use.DOCUMENTED
In a parallel criminal action, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia charged Palafox with money laundering, unlawful monetary transactions, and wire fraud, and he was arraigned on those charges the same day the SEC's civil complaint was filed.DOCUMENTED
- Palafox's company, PGI Global, claimed to be a crypto asset and foreign exchange trading firm and raised approximately $198 million from about 90,000 investors.
- The SEC alleges Palafox misappropriated more than $57 million of investor funds for personal expenses, including Lamborghinis and luxury retail purchases.
- PGI Global sold "membership" packages promising guaranteed high returns, using multi-level-marketing-style referral incentives to recruit new investors.
- The complaint names relief defendants BBMR Threshold LLC, Darvie Mendoza, Marissa Mendoza Palafox, and Linda Ventura, from whom the SEC also seeks disgorgement.
- A related UK operation was shut down by the UK High Court in 2022 after the U.S. Department of Justice seized the website of a connected entity.
The pitch: guaranteed returns and a referral pyramid
According to the SEC's complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Palafox marketed PGI Global as a legitimate crypto asset and foreign exchange trading company from January 2020 through October 2021, offering and selling "membership" packages that he claimed guaranteed investors high returns from the company's supposed cryptocurrency and forex trading activities.DOCUMENTED
The complaint alleges PGI Global's membership structure incorporated multi-level-marketing-style referral incentives, encouraging existing members to recruit new investors in exchange for commissions — a structure that, according to the SEC, allowed the scheme to expand rapidly to approximately 90,000 investors worldwide, even as the underlying trading activity that supposedly generated the promised returns did not exist at the scale needed to support the payouts.DOCUMENTED
Where the money actually went
Rather than deploying investor funds into legitimate trading activity, the SEC's complaint alleges Palafox diverted more than $57 million of investor money for his own personal benefit, spending it on Lamborghinis, purchases from luxury retailers, and other personal expenses. Laura D'Allaird, Chief of the SEC's Cyber and Emerging Technologies Unit, said Palafox "used the guise of innovation to lure investors into lining his pockets with millions of dollars while leaving many victims empty-handed."DOCUMENTED
The complaint also names four relief defendants — BBMR Threshold LLC, Darvie Mendoza, Marissa Mendoza Palafox, and Linda Ventura — from whom the SEC is separately seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest, indicating that at least some of the misappropriated investor funds passed through accounts or entities connected to Palafox's family and associates rather than remaining solely under his own name.DOCUMENTED
A dual citizen with international reach
Palafox, a dual citizen of the United States and the Philippines, operated PGI Global with a reach that extended well beyond U.S. borders. A related operation run under a connected entity, Praetorian Group International Trading Inc., collected approximately £612,425 — worth roughly $816,000 — from UK-based investors between July 2020 and February 2021, before the UK High Court shut down that operation in 2022, following the U.S. Department of Justice's seizure of the connected entity's website.DOCUMENTED
The legal proceedings
The SEC's complaint charges Palafox with violating the antifraud and registration provisions of the federal securities laws and seeks permanent injunctive relief, conduct-based injunctions barring Palafox from participating in future multi-level-marketing programs involving the offer or sale of securities or crypto assets sold as securities, disgorgement of his ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil monetary penalties.DOCUMENTED
On the criminal side, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia is pursuing charges of money laundering, unlawful monetary transactions, and wire fraud against Palafox, exposing him to potential prison time in addition to whatever civil penalties and disgorgement obligations result from the SEC's parallel case. As with any SEC complaint, the allegations against Palafox and the relief defendants have not been proven in court, and Palafox is entitled to a presumption of innocence in the criminal proceeding against him.DOCUMENTED
A familiar pattern in a new asset class
The mechanics the SEC describes in its complaint — guaranteed high returns, a referral-driven recruitment structure resembling a pyramid scheme, and a founder who diverted the bulk of misappropriated funds into personal luxury spending rather than reinvesting in the business — mirror decades of pre-crypto Ponzi and affinity-fraud cases, wrapped in the specific technical vocabulary of crypto asset and foreign exchange trading. Regulators and consumer advocates frequently point to that combination of guaranteed returns and multi-level referral incentives as a reliable warning sign, regardless of what asset class or technology a given investment scheme claims to be built around.REVIEWED
The scheme's multi-level-marketing referral structure is a detail regulators increasingly flag as a red flag in its own right, independent of any specific asset class a scheme claims to trade. When an investment's growth depends as heavily on existing members recruiting new ones as it does on any underlying trading strategy, that structure mathematically resembles a pyramid far more than a legitimate asset-management business, since sustaining promised returns to earlier investors becomes increasingly dependent on a continuous influx of newer investor capital rather than genuine investment performance — the same dynamic that ultimately caused PGI Global's collapse once withdrawal requests began to outpace the funds actually available to pay them.REVIEWED
Investor advocates note that the parallel criminal and civil tracks in cases like this one matter significantly for victims' prospects of recovery: while the SEC's civil case can pursue disgorgement and penalties, actual recovery of misappropriated funds often depends far more on what assets remain once a criminal forfeiture process runs its course, particularly when, as alleged here, tens of millions of dollars were spent on depreciating luxury goods rather than preserved in recoverable accounts.REVIEWED
Sources behind this report
Have documents relevant to this story? Reach us through our tips channel.